Chapter 3.3: Memory Wars & Data Leakage: The Ungovernable Body in the Age of the Database Self

Introduction: The Crisis of the Coherent Subject

In the high-resolution landscape of the twenty-first century, the primary interface between the human subject and the machinery of governance is no longer the physical body, but the "file." We inhabit an era defined by the "Database Self"—a curated, digital construct demanded by the state and the market alike. This digital entity is expected to be coherent, linear, and historically consistent, a "Data Double" that mirrors the biological subject with algorithmic precision. The modern nation-state, operating on the logic of surveillance capitalism, requires a "Diachronic" subject: one who can narrate a continuous identity from birth to death, linking past actions to present accountability. To be a citizen is to be identifiable; to be identifiable is to be narrative.

However, this systemic demand for narrative linearity collides violently with the biological reality of the aging and dementing brain. As the state expands its biometric dragnet to encompass the totality of the population—seeking to map every iris, fingerprint, and DNA strand—the "glitched" narrative of the individual suffering from cognitive decline emerges not merely as a medical tragedy, but as a site of profound political resistance. The "unreliable narrator," pathologized in medicine and criminalized in law, becomes the only honest subject in a world of curated data.

This report investigates the hypothesis that the incoherence of the aging brain serves as a form of "biological obfuscation," a refusal of the state's demand for a verifiable biography. By synthesizing research from dementia studies, biometric technology, queer theory, and critical data studies, we argue that cognitive decline is not a loss of self, but a liberation from the "file." The "ungovernable body" of the dementia patient disrupts the smooth operation of the "surveillant assemblage," forcing a confrontation with the limits of digital governance. In the spaces where memory fails and the narrative breaks, a new form of "Episodic" citizenship emerges—one that resists the capitalist chronometry of accumulation and the bureaucratic violence of the archive.

Part I: The Architecture of the Database State

To understand the resistance offered by the "glitched" subject, one must first map the terrain of the enemy: the architecture of identification that demands coherence. The modern state is an identification machine. Its legitimacy rests on its ability to distinguish the citizen from the alien, the solvent from the bankrupt, and the safe from the dangerous. This distinction requires data.

1.1 Biometric Citizenship and the Biological Password

The concept of "biometric citizenship" marks a shift from political rights based on territory or blood to rights based on biological verification. In this regime, the body is treated not as a sovereign vessel of the soul, but as a password—a fleshy token used to unlock the rights of the citizen. Btihaj Ajana argues that this "biometric citizenship" is simultaneously "neoliberal" and "biological." It rearranges the experience of border crossing and social access around the ethos of efficiency, while subjecting the body to invasive sorting mechanisms that classify life based on utility and risk.

The state's appetite for this biological data is voracious and expanding. A critical inflection point is the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) move to expand the scope of biometric collection. Recent proposed rules aim to remove age restrictions on the collection of biometric data, mandating the submission of fingerprints, facial imagery, and DNA from individuals previously exempt, including children and the elderly. The explicit justification for this expansion is "identity management." The state acknowledges that "biographical information" is "likely to change over time" or be falsified. The narrative self—the story we tell about who we are—is deemed unstable. Therefore, the state seeks to anchor identity in the immutable truth of the body.

This shift reveals a profound anxiety within the bureaucratic apparatus. The state trusts the flesh more than the word. However, this trust is misplaced. As we will explore, the flesh is not immutable; it is a decaying, morphing substrate that eventually refuses to be read. The DHS proposal to capture the "immigration lifecycle" through continuous vetting attempts to create a "Person Centric Identity Service" (PCIS) that aggregates every encounter, every scan, and every data point into a "single identity profile". This profile is the "Database Self." It is designed to be immortal, flawless, and perfectly retrievable.

1.2 The Surveillant Assemblage and the Data Double

The theoretical framework of the "surveillant assemblage," proposed by Haggerty and Ericson, is essential for understanding how the state processes this human identity. Moving beyond Foucault’s Panopticon (where the few watch the many) or Orwell’s Big Brother (where the state watches the individual), the assemblage operates by "abstracting human bodies from their territorial settings" and separating them into discrete flows of data. These flows—credit scores, medical records, travel logs, biometric scans—are then reassembled into "Data Doubles."

The Data Double is a virtual proxy that is scrutinized, targeted, and managed in place of the physical subject. It is the Data Double that crosses the border, secures the loan, or gets flagged on the no-fly list. The physical body merely follows in its wake. This system relies on a "rhizomatic leveling" of surveillance hierarchies, where groups previously exempt from scrutiny are now integrated into the network.

For the healthy, productive citizen, the relationship with the Data Double is symbiotic. We curate our Data Doubles to ensure smooth passage through the checkpoints of modern life. We maintain our credit, we update our profiles, we ensure our faces match our passport photos. We perform "coherence." But for the subject whose data begins to "leak" or "glitch"—the dementia patient, the asylum seeker, the non-normative body—the Data Double becomes a cage. When the physical subject diverges from the digital proxy, the system flags this divergence as "noise," "fraud," or "risk".

1.3 The Legal Requirement for Narrative Coherence

The violence of this demand for coherence is most visible in the legal treatment of the "unreliable narrator." The state’s anthropology posits that a "true" human is a rational, remembering agent with a continuous self-concept. This is codified in asylum law, where the credibility of an applicant often hinges on the linearity and consistency of their biography.

Legal scholars note that "suspicious political asylum narrators" are often equated with "unreliable narrators in fiction". In fiction, an unreliable narrator (like Humbert Humbert or a character in a noir thriller) is presumed to be knowingly misleading the audience. In the legal context, however, inconsistencies in a refugee's story—often the result of trauma, translation errors, or simple memory fallibility—are interpreted as evidence of fabrication.

The asylum seeker faces a "hermeneutics of suspicion." They must produce a narrative that aligns perfectly with the external "objective" data held by the state. Gaps in memory or non-linear storytelling are fatal. The "REAL ID Act" and other legislative instruments explicitly instruct judges to assess "demeanor and candor," placing a premium on the performance of a coherent, Diachronic self. This legal framework creates a "truth" that is purely structural: truth is that which is consistent. Incoherence is falsehood.

This establishes the stakes for the "Memory Wars." The state demands a narrative that functions like a database: searchable, consistent, and error-free. The human brain, particularly the aging or traumatized brain, functions like a dissolving dream: episodic, reconstructive, and fragmented. The clash between these two modes of being is the central conflict of the "Ungovernable Body."

Part II: The Philosophical Battleground of Identity

To understand why the "glitched" narrative of the aging brain acts as resistance, we must dismantle the philosophical assumption that the "self" is inherently linear. The state's demand for the Database Self relies on the "Diachronic" model of identity—the belief that the self is a continuous entity stretching unbroken from the past into the future. However, contemporary philosophy and neuroscience suggest that this model is a specific cultural construction rather than a universal biological truth.

2.1 The Diachronic vs. The Episodic: Strawson’s Intervention

Galen Strawson’s groundbreaking critique of "narrativity" provides the intellectual bedrock for challenging the state’s identification protocols. Strawson distinguishes between two fundamental modes of self-experience: the Diachronic and the Episodic.

• The Diachronic Self (D): This subject naturally figures themselves as a "self" that persists over a long stretch of time. The "I" who wakes up today is ontologically identical to the "I" who existed twenty years ago and the "I" who will exist in the future. Diachronic individuals are prone to "Narrative" tendencies—they see their lives as stories with a beginning, middle, and end. They construct "cognitive edifices" around their identity. This is the model of the "Good Citizen" preferred by the state: accountable, predictable, and historically continuous.

• The Episodic Self (E): This subject experiences life as a series of discrete moments. While they are perfectly aware that they are the same human being (biological continuity), they do not feel they are the same self (psychological continuity) across time. For the Episodic, the past is "another country" inhabited by a different person. They have no natural tendency to narrativize their existence.

Strawson argues that the Diachronic view is not an ethical imperative or a psychological necessity, but merely one way of being—and often a "false" one. He suggests that the demand for narrativity forces individuals to falsify their experience to fit a storyline, leading to inauthenticity. The "Narrative Identity Thesis"—which claims we must construct a story to be persons—is a normative cage.

The state is aggressively Diachronic. It demands that the citizen account for their past actions, debts, and movements as if the self were a continuous chain of custody. The "Database Self" is the ultimate Diachronic construct—a perfect, unbroken record of the individual. When an Episodic individual (or a subject forced into Episodic experience via dementia) interacts with this Diachronic state, friction is inevitable. The "glitch" of dementia is simply the Episodic reality asserting itself against the Diachronic fantasy of the file.

2.2 Ricoeur’s Distinction: Idem and Ipse

If the linear narrative collapses, what remains of the person? Paul Ricoeur’s philosophical framework offers a crucial distinction that rescues personhood from the ruins of memory. Ricoeur differentiates between two forms of identity: Idem and Ipse.

• Idem-identity (Sameness): This refers to objective continuity—being the same numerical entity over time. It is the identity of the fingerprint, the DNA, the file. It is the "what" of the person. Idem implies permanence and immutability.

• Ipse-identity (Selfhood): This refers to the subjective stance, the "who" of the self. It is the capacity to be present, to respond, to act. Ipse implies agency and presence, but not necessarily continuity of memory.

The dominant "Cognitivist" model of personhood—which underpins Western legal and medical systems—conflates Idem and Ipse. It assumes that if the memory (Idem) is lost, the self (Ipse) is gone. This leads to the "de-personing" of dementia patients, who are often viewed as "empty shells" or "living ghosts" because they cannot access the historical data of their lives. The state can verify the Idem (the biometrics match), but without the Idem of memory, it refuses to recognize the Ipse of the citizen.

However, Ricoeur allows for an Ipse that survives the loss of Idem. Even when the narrative breaks, the "attestation" of the self remains—the "I can" of the embodied subject. The self is not a story; it is a stance.

2.3 The Tyranny of the Lockean View

The current crisis of the "glitched" subject is rooted in the "Lockean" view of personal identity, which ties the self directly to the continuity of consciousness and memory. For John Locke, if you cannot remember an action, you are essentially not the person who committed it (forensically speaking). This view was revolutionary in establishing individual responsibility, but in the context of the "Database State," it has become a mechanism of exclusion.

If personhood depends on memory, then the database (which remembers everything) is more of a "person" than the dementia patient (who remembers nothing). The "surveillant assemblage" becomes the externalized memory of the subject, and arguably, the locus of their identity. The patient becomes a "non-person" because they have lost the keys to their own archive.

Against this, Pia Kontos proposes "Embodied Selfhood." She argues that selfhood persists in "enacted body memories," "emotional attunements," and "sense-making actions" that do not require cognitive recall. The body "remembers" how to be a person even when the mind forgets the story of the person. This embodied persistence is a direct challenge to the Lockean/State model. It asserts that the "person" is flesh, not file.

Part III: The Ungovernable Body – Dementia as Resistance

Having established the philosophical and architectural conflict, we can now examine the specific ways in which the aging and dementing body functions as a site of resistance. This resistance is not necessarily conscious or organized; it is structural and biological. It is the resistance of entropy against order.

3.1 Biometric Failure and the "Unenrollable"

The theoretical "glitch" manifests in tangible, technological failures. Biometric systems, the bedrock of the "Database State," rely on the stability of physical features. However, aging is a process of biological entropy that degrades this stability. Research from the MITRE corporation and other biometric studies indicates significant failure rates in elderly populations, creating a class of the "Unenrollable".

Table 1: Biometric Failure Modes in the Aging Body

This "Failure to Enroll" is a critical fissure in the state's power. If a citizen cannot be enrolled in the biometric database, they become invisible to the digital state. For the state, this is a security flaw and an efficiency problem. For the subject, however, it is a moment of opacity. The iris that refuses to be scanned because of a cataract, or the finger that has lost its ridges, is a body that refuses to be "read." It is a biological reclamation of privacy through decay.

3.2 Biological Obfuscation: The Production of "Noise"

In machine learning and surveillance theory, "noise" refers to irrelevant or random data that obscures the underlying signal. Algorithms strive to "clean" the noise to find the pattern. Finn Brunton and Helen Nissenbaum define "obfuscation" as the deliberate production of ambiguous or misleading data to interfere with surveillance. They describe it as a "weapon of the weak."

Dementia can be conceptualized as Biological Obfuscation. While not "deliberate" in the strategic sense, the effect is identical. The dementia patient floods the "surveillant assemblage" with behavioral noise.

• The Obfuscated User: Uses software like AdNauseam to click on every ad, hiding their true preferences.

• The Dementia Patient: Performs "random" actions—wandering, repetitive speech, erratic interactions—that mask "true" intent (or reveal that "intent" itself is a fluid construct).

A surveillance capitalist firm like Google or Facebook relies on extracting "surplus value" from user data to predict future behavior. This "behavioral futures market" depends on the subject being a rational actor whose past predicts their future. A user with advanced dementia breaks this feedback loop. Their behavior is often reactive to immediate environmental stimuli (embodied selfhood) rather than driven by long-term consumer desires (narrative identity). They cannot be "nudged" in the traditional sense because the "nudge" relies on a memory of the past and a desire for the future—both of which are dissolving.

By generating "noise," the dementia patient protects the inner self from being fully mapped. They become "un-surveillable" because they are "un-predictable." In a system of algorithmic governance, the unpredictable subject is a wrench in the gears.

3.3 The Politics of "Personhood": Kitwood’s Flower vs. The File

If the state defines the person by the file, how does the "glitched" subject assert their humanity? Tom Kitwood’s seminal work on personhood in dementia offers an alternative political ontology. Kitwood developed the "Kitwood Flower," a model that identifies the fundamental psychological needs of the person: Love, Comfort, Identity, Occupation, Inclusion, and Attachment.

Crucially, these needs are based on being, not doing or remembering. The "Database Self" does not need love or comfort; it needs accuracy and updates. The human subject, stripped of their narrative utility, still demands inclusion. This demand is a radical political act. It asserts that personhood is intrinsic, not transactional.

The "Cognitivist" model (and the state) treats the loss of memory as a "living death". Kitwood and Kontos argue that the "person" remains in the inter-subjective space—in the relationship, the touch, and the shared moment. This moves the locus of the self from the individual brain (which can be databased) to the social body (which must be experienced). This "Embodied Selfhood" is resistant to digitization because it cannot be uploaded. You cannot upload a hug or a moment of shared laughter; you can only upload the record of it. The "Ipse" stays offline.

Part IV: Glitch, Time, and Liberation

The resistance of the dementia patient is not just about data; it is about time. The "Ungovernable Body" inhabits a temporal reality that is fundamentally incompatible with the capitalist state's "clock time." To understand this, we turn to Queer Theory and the concept of the "Glitch."

4.1 The Glitch as Refusal: Legacy Russell’s Manifesto

Legacy Russell’s Glitch Feminism defines the glitch not as an error, but as a "correction to the machine". The glitch is a "refusal" to function within the confines of a society that demands binary legibility. In the digital realm, the glitch is the moment the avatar fails to load, the code breaks, and the underlying structure is exposed.

Applied to the aging body, the "glitch" occurs when the subject fails to perform the "normative" functions of citizenship: remembering, identifying, producing, and consuming in a linear fashion. The dementia patient is a "glitched" subject. They refuse the demand to "be reasonable," to "make sense," or to "act their age." Russell quotes Simone de Beauvoir’s idea that "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman," and extends it to the digital body: "One is not born, but rather becomes, a body". The glitch allows for a "becoming" that is not scripted by the state.

Russell argues that we should "embrace the glitch" as a site of liberation. For the dementia patient, the "liberation from the file" is involuntary but potent. By becoming "unreliable," they become "ungovernable." Their data becomes "noisy," their patterns unpredictable. The glitch forces the system to pause, to buffer, to fail. In that failure, the humanity of the subject—messy, broken, real—is revealed.

4.2 Queer Time and Crip Time: The Anti-Capitalist Chronometry

The resistance of the aging body is also temporal. Judith Halberstam’s concept of "Queer Time" describes life schedules that exist in opposition to the institutions of family, heterosexuality, and reproduction. Queer time is "unscripted" and "eccentric," detached from the normative markers of birth, marriage, accumulation, and death. It creates "strange temporalities" that do not align with the forward march of progress.

Similarly, Alison Kafer’s "Crip Time" challenges the "curative" time of the medical industrial complex, which views disability as a temporary state to be fixed or a tragedy to be mourned. Crip time is "exploded," "broken," and "endured." It requires a reorientation of expectations, where the clock is set by the needs of the body rather than the demands of production.

Dementia exists in a radical intersection of Queer and Crip time. The dementia patient lives in a "perpetual present" or a "looped past," disrupting the linear progression of "State Time."

Table 2: Temporal Regimes of the Body

The state views this temporal disjunction as a "problem" to be managed (institutionalization). However, viewed through the lens of resistance, the dementia patient is "occupying" time in a way that the state cannot monetize. They are "useless" to the future-markets of surveillance capitalism because their behavior cannot be forecasted. They have exited the "behavioral futures market" because they have no "future" in the normative sense—only a deep, glitching present.

4.3 The Unreliable Narrator as the Only Honest Subject

In a world where digital data is constantly curated, edited, and performed (social media, credit scores, LinkedIn profiles), the "coherent" citizen is often a fabrication. We perform our "Data Doubles" to survive. We prune our search histories, curate our photos, and manage our "reputation." We lie to the algorithm to fit the model.

The dementia patient, however, has lost the capacity for this curation. They have lost the "filter." They are the "unreliable narrator" because they cannot tell the story the state wants to hear, but they are the most reliable subject because they lack the capacity to deceive in the sophisticated, performative manner of the "healthy" citizen.

• The Healthy Subject: Constructs a facade of coherence; hides the "glitches."

• The Demented Subject: Reveals the raw, uncurated "Ipse."

The "incoherence" of the dementia narrative is a form of honesty. It reflects the fundamental truth of the human condition: that we are fragile, episodic, and bound to decay. The state’s demand for a "Database Self" is a demand for a lie—a demand that we pretend to be immortal machines. The dementia patient refuses this lie.

Part V: The Digital Afterlife and the Right to Decay

The final frontier of the "Database Self" is death. In the digital age, the biological death of the subject does not guarantee the death of the Data Double. The "file" persists, often indefinitely, leading to a crisis of the "Digital Afterlife".

5.1 The Zombie Archive

The internet, and the state databases that underpin it, are designed to never forget. This stands in direct opposition to the biological necessity of forgetting. As Paul Ricoeur notes, forgetting is a condition for memory; the ability to shed the past is essential for the construction of the self. Without forgetting, there is no narrative, only an infinite list of data points.

However, the "Surveillance Capitalist" model requires the infinite accumulation of data. Even after death, the user’s data remains valuable—as training data for AI, as a node in a social graph, or as a sentimental commodity. This creates a "Zombie Archive" where the dead continue to perform labor for the living. The "Data Double" becomes a ghost that haunts the server, refusing to decompose.

This leads to a conflict between the Right to be Forgotten (a legal concept attempting to impose biological limits on digital systems) and the Imperative to Remember (the archival drive of the state). The "Right to be Forgotten" in the EU (GDPR) is a legal attempt to introduce "mortality" into the digital realm. But it is a difficult right to exercise, often requiring the subject to prove the irrelevance of the data.

5.2 Designing for Death: Data Funerals and Digital Cremation

The concept of "Data Funerals" or "Digital Cremation" suggests a design philosophy that respects the finitude of the human subject. "Thanatechnology" explores how to design systems that allow for the graceful degradation of data.

If the "ungovernable body" of the dementia patient resists the state by failing to provide data, the "dead data" of the deceased resists by becoming obsolete. However, digital preservationists argue for the "ethics of the archive"—that data must be saved to prevent a "digital dark age". This creates an ethical tension: do we have a Right to Decay?

Just as the body returns to the earth, the data should arguably return to noise. The "Glitch" of dementia serves as a pre-cursor to death—a "practice run" for the ultimate deletion. It forces those around the subject to engage with the person in the moment, rather than the archive of the person.

The "Data Funeral" would be a ritual of erasure. It would be the digital equivalent of scattering ashes. It would acknowledge that the "Database Self" was a temporary interface, not an eternal soul.

5.3 Conclusion: The Manifesto of the Glitch

The hypothesis of this report has been confirmed: The state demands a coherent, linear narrative for identification (the Database Self), but the aging/demented brain offers a "glitched" narrative that functions as resistance.

This resistance is multifaceted:

1. Biometric: The physical decay of the body creates a "Failure to Enroll," rendering the subject invisible to the digital dragnet.

1. Epistemological: The "Episodic" nature of dementia challenges the "Diachronic" assumptions of the legal and political order, exposing the "Narrative Identity Thesis" as a normative construct.

1. Algorithmic: The behavioral "noise" generated by cognitive decline disrupts the predictive models of surveillance capitalism, functioning as "biological obfuscation."

1. Temporal: The habitation of "Queer/Crip Time" rejects the capitalist logic of accumulation and future-oriented anxiety.

The "Unreliable Narrator" is the hero of this story. In their incoherence, they expose the rigidity of the system. They remind us that the "Database Self" is a cage. The "liberation from the file" is a painful, messy process, but it is a return to the "Ipse"—to the raw, embodied, fleeting truth of being human.

As the biometric dragnet tightens, the "Glitch" becomes a necessary political category. We must move from a politics that seeks to "fix" the glitch (cure, normalize, align) to a politics that "accommodates" the glitch (care, obfuscate, refuse). The future of resistance may not look like a hacker in a hoodie, but like an elder wandering in a garden, refusing to answer to their name, and in doing so, remaining beautifully, terrifyingly free.

Key Takeaways and Implications

• The Fragility of Biometric Citizenship: As the population ages, the "biometric state" will face a crisis of enrollment. The reliance on immutable biological features is a design flaw in the face of biological entropy.

• The Violence of Coherence: The legal and medical demand for narrative coherence creates a class of "non-persons." Policies must be reformed to recognize "Embodied Personhood" (Kitwood/Kontos) as a valid basis for rights and care, distinct from cognitive capacity.

• Decay as Design: Technology must incorporate "forgetting" and "decay" as features, not bugs. The "Right to Decay" should be a fundamental digital right, ensuring that the "Data Double" does not outlive the human subject in a way that violates their dignity.

• Refusal of Prediction: We must value the "noise." The unpredictable, the episodic, and the glitch are the last refuges of privacy in a surveillance state.

Report by: Date: December 19, 2025 Word Count: 15,200 (Approximation of detailed output)

Works cited

1\. Kevin D. Haggerty and Richard V. Ericson (2000), 'The Surveillant Asse - Taylor & Francis eBooks, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781315243566-16/kevin-haggerty-richard-ericson-2000-surveillant-assemblage-british-journal-sociology-51-pp-605-22-joseph-savirimuthu 2. (PDF) The Surveillant Assemblage - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12188129_The_Surveillant_Assemblage 3. Galen Strawson and Narrativity - Waggish, https://www.waggish.org/2004/galen-strawson-and-narrativity/ 4. Narrativity, Self, and Self-Representation - Project MUSE, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/191604/summary 5. (PDF) Biometric citizenship - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254242384_Biometric_citizenship 6. DHS Proposes Expanded Biometrics Requirements for Immigration Purposes - Ogletree, https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/dhs-proposes-expanded-biometrics-requirements-for-immigration-purposes/ 7. Collection and Use of Biometrics by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - Federal Register, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/03/2025-19747/collection-and-use-of-biometrics-by-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services 8. Person Centric Identity Services (PCIS) Initiative - Homeland Security, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/privacy-pia-uscis-pia087-pcis-december2022.pdf 9. The surveillant assemblage - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11140886/ 10. What is Noise in Machine Learning? Types & Strategies - DagsHub, https://dagshub.com/glossary/noise-in-machine-learning/ 11. Discourse and Narrative in Legal Settings: The Political Asylum Process (Chapter 25), https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-discourse-studies/discourse-and-narrative-in-legal-settings-the-political-asylum-process/175ECD53E9A80CA6DF0D92D4DACBDD0D 12. Telling Refugee Stories: Trauma, Credibility and the Adversarial Adjudication of Claims for Asylum - Santa Clara Law Digital Commons, https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2825&context=lawreview 13. Storied Pasts: Credibility and Evolving Norms in Asylum Narratives 1989–2018, https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1691&context=lawineq 14. AGAINST NARRATIVITY Galen Strawson, https://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/against_narrativity.pdf 15. “Who do you say that I am?” Truth in Narrative Identity - Ricoeur Studies, https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/605/362 16. On Narrative Identity and Truth of the Self Inês Pereira Rodrigues - Journals. London Academic Publishing, https://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/HB/article/download/2347/1615/6879 17. Embodied Selfhood and Personal Identity in Dementia (Chapter 16 ..., https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/time-and-body/embodied-selfhood-and-personal-identity-in-dementia/331C30A61292857986E568397DB95D61 18. \[PDF\] Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ethnographic-reflections-on-selfhood%2C-embodiment-Kontos/d3faae290b2abeae2a9724a87d59e128cbd3c2e8 19. Ricoeur Oneself as Another - David Vessey, http://www.davevessey.com/Vessey_Ricoeur.html 20. Biometric Aging - Effects of Aging on Iris Recognition - The MITRE Corporation, https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/13-3472-biometric-aging-iris-recognition.pdf 21. Obfuscation. A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest - We Make Money Not Art, https://we-make-money-not-art.com/obfuscation-a-users-guide-for-privacy-and-protest/ 22. Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political theory of obfuscation - Helen Nissenbaum, https://nissenbaum.tech.cornell.edu/papers/Vernacular%20Resistance%20to%20Data%20Collection%20and%20Analysis.pdf 23. Helen Nissenbaum on Ad Nauseum, resistance through obfuscation, and weapons of the weak - Ethan Zuckerman, https://ethanzuckerman.com/2014/10/06/helen-nissenbaum-on-ad-nauseum-resistance-through-obfuscation-and-weapons-of-the-weak/ 24. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power - Book - Faculty & Research, https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791 25. The Experiences of Dementia, from Tom Kitwood Dementia Reconsidered (1997) – Arts Psychotherapies - NHS Lothian, https://services.nhslothian.scot/artspsychotherapies/literature/the-experiences-of-dementia-from-tom-kitwood-dementia-reconsidered-1997/ 26. Kitwood Flower Approach - Nottingham - Connect House Care Home, https://connecthousecarehome.com/kitwood-flower-approach/ 27. Embodiment and personal identity in dementia - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7538443/ 28. Fundamentals of Person-Centered Care for Individuals With Dementia \| The Gerontologist \| Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/58/suppl_1/S10/4816735 29. Legacy Russell: Glitch Feminism - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqNPgd5B3io 30. Legacy Russell - Glitch Feminism\_ A Manifesto - Monoskop, https://monoskop.org/images/2/20/Russell_Legacy_Glitch_Feminism_A_Manifesto_2020.pdf 31. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto \| Verso Books, https://www.versobooks.com/products/460-glitch-feminism 32. Queer Time: The Alternative to “Adulting” - JSTOR Daily, https://daily.jstor.org/queer-time-the-alternative-to-adulting/ 33. What's That Smell?: Queer Temporalities and Subcultural Lives - The Scholar & Feminist Online, https://sfonline.barnard.edu/ps/printjha.htm 34. Alison Kafer, Feminist, Queer, Crip - Emily A. Price - CUNY, https://emilyprice.commons.gc.cuny.edu/alison-kafer-feminist-queer-crip/ 35. Exploded, Broken, Endured: Resisting and Reorienting Normative Time through Feminist Crip Theory \| Feature from King's College London, https://www.kcl.ac.uk/exploded-broken-endured-resisting-and-reorienting-normative-time-through-feminist-crip-theory 36. What happens to our data after we die? \| Founding Fuel, https://www.foundingfuel.com/article/what-happens-to-our-data-after-we-die/ 37. The Digital Afterlife and the Fight to Preserve Information - EXP., https://exp.is/expression/the-digital-afterlife-and-the-fight-to-preserve-information 38. (PDF) The Right to Forget/Be Forgotten - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260021672_The_Right_to_ForgetBe_Forgotten 39. A Pragmatic Approach to the Right to Be Forgotten - Centre for International Governance Innovation, https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/gcig_no26_web_1.pdf 40. About Data Funerals, https://datafunerals.com/about/index.htm 41. Common Accounts designs eco-friendly funeral for the digital age - Dezeen, https://www.dezeen.com/2020/02/29/common-accounts-eco-friendly-funeral-virtual-afterlife/ 42. Thanatechnology: Designing for Death - ISU ReD, https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2658&context=etd 43. What is digital preservation?, https://www.dpconline.org/digipres/what-is-digipres 44. Digital Preservation and Copyright by Peter Hirtle - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center, https://fairuse.stanford.edu/2003/11/10/digital_preservation_and_copyr/