Chapter 2.1: The Boredom Strike

Chapter 2.1: The Boredom Strike

Abstract

This report constitutes the foundational analysis for Chapter 2.1 of the "Ungovernable Body" trilogy. It investigates the political economy of the "Attention Economy," positing that the term is a misnomer; the digital ecosystem is more accurately described as an "Arousal Economy" that relies on the extraction of high-valence, negative emotional states to drive engagement and profitability. Through a synthesis of neuro-economics, affect theory, and labor history, this report argues that the cultivation of "boredom"—specifically "radical boredom" or "profound idleness"—constitutes a form of economic sabotage. By refusing the dopaminergic imperatives of the platform (Reward Prediction Error) and adopting the "stuplime" resistance of the "Italian Strike" (Work-to-Rule), the digital subject can dismantle the extraction loops that govern contemporary life. This document provides an exhaustive examination of the neural mechanisms of control, the gendered dimensions of affective labor, and the spatial politics of "drift" as a revolutionary praxis.

1. The Neuro-Political Economy of High Arousal

The prevailing critique of digital capitalism focuses on the "Attention Economy"—the idea that human attention is a scarce commodity for which corporations compete. However, a granular analysis of neuro-economic data suggests that "attention" is merely the vector; the actual commodity being mined is "arousal." The digital infrastructure is not designed merely to be looked at; it is designed to modulate the nervous system, specifically targeting the circuitry of anticipation, threat detection, and reward processing. To understand the "Boredom Strike" as a strategy, one must first map the neural terrain of the occupation.

1.1 The Dopamine Loop and Reward Prediction Error (RPE)

The central mechanism of algorithmic governance is the manipulation of the dopaminergic system, specifically through the exploitation of Reward Prediction Error (RPE). Contrary to popular understanding, dopamine is not a "pleasure molecule" associated with satiety; it is a "seeking molecule" associated with desire, anticipation, and the encoding of learning errors.¹

RPE is the difference between an expected outcome and the actual outcome. The brain’s Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) and Substantia Nigra (SN) calculate this error to update the organism’s model of the world.²

• Positive RPE: Occurs when an outcome is better than expected (e.g., a post receives 100 likes instead of the expected 10). This triggers a phasic burst of dopamine, reinforcing the behavior (posting) and encoding the context as "valuable."

• Negative RPE: Occurs when an outcome is worse than expected (e.g., a post receives zero engagement). This triggers a dip in dopamine firing—a "pause"—which is subjectively experienced as disappointment or craving, driving the organism to seek a restorative reward.⁴

• The Role of Surprise: Research indicates that VTA/SN responses are most active when stimuli are unexpected.² If a reward is fully predicted (i.e., the user knows exactly what they will see when they open an app), dopamine firing remains at baseline. There is no "learning" required, and thus no chemical reinforcement.

Social media platforms have industrialized this biological mechanism by implementing "Variable Ratio Schedules" of reinforcement—the same psychological logic utilized in slot machines. The "pull-to-refresh" gesture is the lever. The algorithm ensures that the user can never accurately predict the valence of the next item in the feed. It might be a "reward" (a validation, a funny meme) or a "punishment" (a disturbing image, a lack of notifications). This unpredictability ensures that RPE signals are constantly being generated, keeping the dopaminergic system in a state of chronic hyper-arousal.⁶ The user does not scroll because they are happy; they scroll because they are chemically compelled to resolve the prediction error.

1.2 The Primacy of Negative Valence: The Outrage Optimization

While positive RPE reinforces habit, "Negative Arousal" drives the intensity of engagement. The "Attention Economy" disproportionately relies on high-arousal negative emotions—outrage, indignation, fear, and disgust—to arrest attention.

Meta-analyses of fMRI studies on RPE reveal distinct neural networks for processing "valence" (good/bad) and "surprise" (intensity).³ The "negative valence" network involves the mid-cingulate cortex and the thalamus—regions associated with alertness, threat detection, and "switching behaviors".³ When a user encounters "outrageous" content, the amygdala is activated, triggering a fight-or-flight response that floods the system with cortisol and adrenaline.

Algorithmic auditing confirms that content conveying high-arousal negative emotions is significantly more likely to be shared and engaged with than neutral or low-arousal positive content.⁷ This has led to a measurable shift in the psychometric profile of media. A longitudinal analysis of headlines over the past decade shows a statistically significant rise in words denoting fear, disgust, and anger, and a concurrent decline in words denoting neutrality or joy.⁸

• The Engagement-Enragement Loop: As Scott Galloway notes, "Enragement equals engagement equals more ads equals more shareholder value".¹ The algorithm does not "know" it is promoting hatred; it simply observes that "High Arousal" content generates longer dwell times and higher click-through rates than "Low Arousal" (Boredom) content.

• The Neural Cost: This reliance on negative arousal creates a "negativity bias" trap. The brain prioritizes threat information over safety information. By artificially saturating the feed with "threats" (political outrage, social status threats), the platform hacks the evolutionary survival mechanism, making it physiologically difficult for the user to "look away".⁷

Table 1: The Affective Extraction Matrix

The "Boredom Strike" is, therefore, an intervention at the level of the neurotransmitter. It is the deliberate refusal to provide the "High Arousal" response that the machine requires to validate its prediction models.

2. Affect Theory: The Stuplime vs. The Radical Bore

To weaponize boredom, we must distinguish between the types of boredom present in the digital ecosystem. Not all boredom is revolutionary; some forms are engineered tools of submission. Sianne Ngai’s theory of "Ugly Feelings" provides the taxonomy required to differentiate between the "stuplime" paralysis of the feed and the "radical boredom" of the strike.

2.1 The Stuplime: Shock Agglutinated with Boredom

Sianne Ngai introduces the concept of "stuplimity"—a portmanteau of "stupid" and "sublime"—to describe the aesthetic experience of the information age.⁹ The traditional "Sublime" (Kantian) involves a confrontation with the infinite (nature, God) that terrifies and then elevates the subject. The "Stuplime," by contrast, involves a confrontation with the "vast but bounded" accumulation of data.¹¹

Stuplimity is the synthesis of two opposing affects: Shock (a high level of stimulation) and Boredom (a low level of interest). It is the feeling of reading Gertrude Stein’s The Making of Americans—a text of relentless repetition and slight variation—or, more contemporarily, the feeling of scrolling through a social media feed.¹¹

• The Mechanism of Accumulation: Stuplimity arises from the "agglutination" of finite bits. The user is bombarded with disparate, disconnected units of information: a war crime, a cat video, a celebrity scandal, a shoe advertisement. The sheer volume creates a "thick," viscous atmosphere of fatigue.¹²

• Obstructed Agency: Unlike the sublime, which empowers the subject through reason, the stuplime "stupefies" the subject. It produces a state of "obstructed agency" where the user is paralyzed by the "heap" of data.⁹ This is the "numbing feeling of 'whatever'" that characterizes the digital burnout state.¹³

• Political Utility: The platform relies on stuplimity. It needs the user to be "shocked" enough to keep looking, but "bored" enough to remain passive. A user who is truly "sublime" (elevated) or truly "angry" (mobilized) might leave the screen to act. The stuplime user remains fixed in a state of "exhausted attention".¹¹

2.2 Radical Boredom and "Profound Idleness"

In opposition to the stuplime stands "Radical Boredom," or what philosopher Byung-Chul Han calls "profound boredom".¹⁴ Han argues that the "Burnout Society" is driven by "hyper-attention"—a frantic, scattered focus that jumps between stimuli without ever resting. This hyper-activity erodes the capacity for "deep attention," which is the prerequisite for culture, philosophy, and creativity.¹⁴

Radical boredom is the "peak of mental relaxation".¹⁶ It is the threshold where the subject ceases to be a "project" (self-optimizing) and becomes a "subject" (self-reflecting).

• The "Exclude Instinct": Han, drawing on Nietzsche, argues that the digital subject has lost the "exclude instinct"—the ability to say "no" to a stimulus.¹⁷ We are "hyper-passive," obeying every notification and impulse. Radical boredom restores this instinct. It is the practice of not reacting.

• The Revolutionary Potential: As Walter Benjamin noted, "If sleep is the apogee of physical relaxation, boredom is the apogee of mental relaxation".¹⁸ It is the "dream bird that hatches the egg of experience".¹⁵ By enduring the initial discomfort of boredom (the withdrawal from dopamine), the subject accesses the "Vita Contemplativa"—a space of non-productive time that capitalism cannot monetize.

2.3 Boredom as a Diagnostic "Ugly Feeling"

Ngai argues that "minor" or "ugly" feelings (envy, irritation, boredom) are often more politically diagnostic than "major" emotions like anger.⁹ Anger implies a clear enemy and a dramatic narrative (e.g., "I will overthrow the tyrant"). Boredom, however, reveals the structural banality of the oppression.

When we allow ourselves to be bored by the feed, rather than engaging with its manufactured outrage, we see it for what it is: a repetitive, mechanical system of extraction. Boredom strips the "aura" from the digital commodity.¹⁰ It reveals the "gimmick".¹⁹ The "Boredom Strike" uses this ugly feeling as a diagnostic tool to de-mystify the algorithm.

3. The History of Refusal: Labor Tactics Reimagined

If "attention is labor"—if the user is a "playborer" generating value for the platform—then the withdrawal of attention must be framed as a labor dispute. The history of industrial action offers precise tactical models for the "Boredom Strike." Specifically, the strategies of the "Slowdown" and "Work-to-Rule" provide a blueprint for digital non-compliance.

3.1 The Glasgow Dockers and the "Conscientious Withdrawal of Efficiency"

In 1899, dock workers in Glasgow demanded a 10% wage increase. When the employers refused, employing agricultural laborers as scabs to break the strike, the union leadership did not call for a walkout. Instead, the union secretary told the workers to return to work, but to "work as the agricultural laborers worked".²¹

The agricultural scabs had been inefficient, clumsy, and slow, dropping merchandise and taking twice as long to load vessels. The experienced dockers returned to work and meticulously mimicked this incompetence. They followed every safety rule to the extreme, checked every knot, and moved with a deliberate, agonizing slowness. Within days, the contractors begged the union to restore normal efficiency and granted the pay raise.²¹

Digital Application: The "Boredom Strike" is the digital equivalent of the Glasgow Slowdown. The user does not delete their account (which would be a "Walkout" or "Lockout," often leading to social isolation). Instead, they inhabit the platform with "conscientious inefficiency."

• The "Clumsy" User: The user deliberately creates "noise" in the data signal. They click on irrelevant links. They pause on advertisements but do not click. They leave items in the shopping cart but never check out. They degrade the "efficiency" of the algorithmic profiling system.

3.2 The "Italian Strike" (Work-to-Rule)

Also known as the sciopero bianco or "white strike," "Work-to-Rule" involves workers doing exactly what their contract stipulates, and nothing more.²² They withdraw all "discretionary effort" and "goodwill." In a factory, this means following every safety check, taking every allotted break to the second, and refusing to improvise solutions to problems.²²

Digital Application: The digital platform relies on "discretionary effort"—the user’s willingness to "like," "share," "comment," and produce content for free. The "Work-to-Rule" user refuses this unpaid labor.

• Contractual Compliance: The user maintains the account (the "contract") but provides zero "affective surplus." They view the content (as the "terms of service" imply access) but do not engage.

• The "Gray Rock" Defense: Borrowing from psychological strategies for dealing with narcissists, the user becomes a "Gray Rock"—uninteresting, unresponsive, and boring. The algorithm, which feeds on reaction (positive or negative), starves.

3.3 Quiet Quitting vs. The Strike

The phenomenon of "Quiet Quitting" (doing the bare minimum at work) mirrors this tactic.²³ However, media narratives often frame Quiet Quitting as individual "burnout" or "laziness".²⁵ The "Boredom Strike" politicizes this withdrawal. It is not a result of exhaustion; it is a strategy of exhaustion directed at the platform.

• From "Hustle" to "Drift": The "Hustle Culture" of the internet demands the curation of a "marketable identity".¹⁵ The "Ungovernable Body" refuses to hustle. It adopts the "drift" as a permanent state of being, rejecting the "indebtpending" logic that demands we mortgage our present attention for future (illusory) status.¹³

Table 2: Industrial vs. Digital Labor Actions

4. The Gendered Biopolitics of Attention

The extraction of attention is not gender-neutral. The "Attention Economy" disproportionately capitalizes on the socialization of women to be "responsive," "empathic," and "available." The "Boredom Strike" is, therefore, a specifically feminist refusal of the "Pink Tax" on emotional labor.

4.1 The "Pink Tax" on Affect

Sociolinguistic research, such as that by Deborah Tannen, highlights the gendered expectation of "audio lubrication"—the use of phatic communication (nods, "uh-huhs," smiles) to maintain the flow of conversation and manage the emotional comfort of others. In the digital sphere, this translates to the expectation that women will "manage" the emotional tone of the feed.

• The Double Bind: Women are penalized for "hysteria" (High Arousal Negative) but also for "bitchiness" or "coldness" (Low Arousal). The algorithm demands a "Goldilocks" level of engagement: high enough to generate data, but modulated enough to be "consumable."

• Indebtpending and Girlhood: The concept of "indebtpending" is particularly acute for young women, who are pressured to curate a "becoming" self—a future-oriented, optimized version of womanhood.¹³ The refusal to "become"—to simply "be" in a state of boredom—is a rejection of this debt.

4.2 "Bored With Meg": The Co-optation of Refusal

The commodification of boredom is evident in the "What to do When You're Bored" YouTube genre, exemplified by creators like "Meg".²⁸ These videos target teenage girls and reframe boredom not as a systemic issue or a moment of reflection, but as a "problem" of management.

• The Boredom Manager: The viewer is constructed as a "manager" of their own affect. The videos provide lists of consumption-based activities (DIY projects, reorganizing rooms, watching other videos) to "fix" the boredom.²⁸

• Neutralizing the Critical Potential: By immediately filling the void of boredom with "busy work," these cultural products neutralize the "critical work" that boredom might otherwise perform.²⁸ They prevent the subject from reaching the state of "Radical Boredom" where the structural emptiness of the platform might be revealed.

• The Feminist Counter-Tactic: The "Boredom Strike" involves failing to manage the boredom. It involves letting the "dead air" sit. As Sianne Ngai notes, "ugly feelings" like boredom are indexes of obstructed agency.⁹ By refusing to "solve" the boredom, the subject forces the obstruction into visibility.

4.3 Weaponized Silence

Silence is the auditory analog of boredom. In negotiation theory, silence is a "status threat" that forces the other party to reveal their position or make concessions \[Volume 2.2\]. In the digital realm, "Weaponized Silence" is the refusal to "reply," "quote-tweet," or "acknowledge."

• The "Cold Woman": The archetype of the "Cold Woman" is one who withholds the "audio lubrication." She is "unread" by the algorithm because she offers no emotional surface area for the RPE mechanism to grip. She is the "Unreliable Narrator" (Volume 3.3) who refuses to provide a coherent data story.

5. Spatial Sabotage: From Psychogeography to the Luddite Club

The "Boredom Strike" is also a spatial strategy. The "Smart City" and the "Digital Platform" are designed to be "frictionless"—to move the user from Point A (Desire) to Point B (Purchase) as efficiently as possible. This efficiency is a form of governance. To be "ungovernable" is to be inefficient. It is to "drift."

5.1 The Situationist Dérive

The Situationist International (SI), led by Guy Debord, proposed the dérive (drift) as a method of navigating the city.³⁰ The dérive involves dropping all usual motives for movement (work, errands) and letting oneself be drawn by the attractions of the terrain and the encounters they find there. It is a technique of "psychogeography"—studying the precise laws and specific effects of the geographical environment on the emotions and behavior of individuals.³¹

In the digital realm, the algorithm acts as the "urban planner," funneling users into "echo chambers" and "filter bubbles" designed to maximize engagement (and outrage). The "Digital Dérive" is the practice of breaking these lines of force.³²

5.2 Drifting Against the Algorithm

A "Digital Dérive" involves intentional "aimlessness." It is the act of browsing without a destination, clicking on links that the algorithm did not suggest, and exploring the "dead zones" of the internet—the archives, the old blogs, the non-commercial spaces.³³

• Algorithmic Confusion: Algorithms rely on "predictive behavior." A user who drifts unpredictably—jumping from a Wikipedia article on 14th-century pottery to a local news site in a different country—generates "noisy" data. The prediction error increases. The "profile" blurs.

• The "Right to the City" (Digital): Just as hostile architecture removes benches to prevent loitering \[Volume 1.3\], digital platforms remove "exit points" to prevent leaving. The "Drift" reclaims the digital space as a place of habitation rather than transit.

5.3 The Luddite Club: A Case Study in Embodied Refusal

The abstract theory of the "Boredom Strike" is operationalized by the "Luddite Club," a group of teenagers in New York City (founded by Logan Lane) who meet weekly on the steps of the Central Library and drift into Prospect Park.²⁷

• The Protocol: Members relinquish their smartphones, often replacing them with "dumb" flip phones (e.g., the Cingular Flip 2). They engage in "low-arousal" activities: sketching, reading, listening to the wind, or simply sitting in silence.³⁴

• The Transition: Members report an initial period of intense anxiety and boredom (the withdrawal of the dopamine loop), followed by a "opening up" of the world. One member noted, "I started using my brain. It made me observe myself as a person".³⁴

• Political Act: This is not merely a "lifestyle choice"; it is a political formation. By creating a community based on disconnection, they challenge the "network effect" (the value of a network increases with the number of users). They propose an "anti-network effect": the value of the self increases with the degree of disconnection. They reclaim the public space (the park) from the digital overlay.

6. The Economics of the Glitch: Why Boredom Breaks the Bank

The "Boredom Strike" is not just a spiritual or psychological benefit to the user; it is a direct financial threat to the platform. The "Attention Economy" relies on specific metrics of "arousal" to sell advertising. Boredom acts as a "glitch" that renders this inventory worthless.

6.1 Banner Blindness and Low Arousal

Marketing research consistently demonstrates that "High Arousal" states are necessary for effective advertising.

• Banner Blindness: Users have developed a subconscious filter, known as "banner blindness," where they automatically ignore peripheral content. High-arousal stimuli (bright colors, flashing motion, shocking imagery) are required to penetrate this filter.³⁵

• Ad Recall Rates: A study on ad effectiveness found that high-intensity emotional ads had significantly higher immediate recall (60.4%) compared to low-intensity ads (22%).³⁷

• Conversion and Arousal: "Low arousal" states (relaxation, boredom) weaken the motivation to take action (click, buy). Consumers in a low-arousal state are more likely to "maintain the status quo".³⁸

Table 3: The Economic Impact of User Affect

6.2 The Unprofitable Subject

A user practicing "Radical Boredom" is an unprofitable subject. They do not generate the "behavioral surplus" (Zuboff) required to train the AI models. They do not respond to the "nudges" of the interface. They are "technically" present (logged in), but "economically" absent. This "Zombie User" consumes server resources without generating revenue—the ultimate parasite on the platform model.

7. Protocol for the Boredom Strike

How does one operationalize this theory into a daily practice? The research suggests a set of protocols—a "tradecraft" of the bored—to reclaim the Ungovernable Body.

7.1 Protocol 1: The Dopamine Fast (Neuro-Reset)

To break the cycle of "high arousal" dependency, the subject must undergo a "neuro-reset." This involves a period of radical disconnection to lower the baseline for dopamine stimulation.³⁹

• Objective: To re-sensitize the brain to "low-arousal" stimuli.

• Mechanism: By removing the "super-stimuli" of the feed, the brain's "Reward Prediction Error" calibration resets. Mundane activities (walking, reading paper, staring at a wall) become chemically sufficient.¹⁴

• Outcome: The "fear of missing out" (FOMO) is replaced by the "joy of missing out" (JOMO). The subject reclaims the "capacity to delay" (Han).

7.2 Protocol 2: The "Gray Rock" Algorithmic Defense

As detailed in the "Work-to-Rule" section, this protocol involves starving the algorithm of sentiment data.

• Tactic: Disable "read receipts." Turn off all notifications (the "ding" is a Pavlovian trigger). Browse in "Incognito" mode not just for privacy, but for profile hygiene.

• Somatic Refusal: When feeling the urge to "react" (outrage), the subject physically puts the device down. This creates a "gap" between stimulus and response—the space where "freedom" exists (Viktor Frankl / Byung-Chul Han).¹⁷

7.3 Protocol 3: Sleep Sovereignty

Jenny Odell’s How to Do Nothing and Jonathan Crary’s 24/7 identify sleep as the final frontier of resistance.⁴¹

• The Nap as Protest: In a 24/7 economy, sleeping for pleasure rather than recovery is a radical act. It rejects the body-as-machine metaphor.

• No-Tech Bedroom: Removing all sensors and screens from the sleeping area prevents the "colonization" of the unconscious. It ensures that the "drift" of dreams remains un-monetized.

8. Conclusion: The Right to Rot

The "Attention Economy" is a war on the interiority of the subject. By demanding constant, high-arousal engagement, it evacuates the self, leaving only a "hollow woman" who performs emotions for an algorithmic audience.⁴² The imperative to be "interesting," "visible," and "productive" is a mechanism of control.

The "Boredom Strike" is the reclamation of that interiority. It is the assertion that my boredom is my own. It is not a gap to be filled by advertisers; it is the fertile soil from which the self grows. As Byung-Chul Han argues, "The society of fatigue is the society of the slow".¹⁴

In the "Ungovernable Body" trilogy, Volume 1 (SCANNED) dealt with the visibility of the body. Volume 2 (DRIFT) deals with the tempo of the body. To be "ungovernable" is to move at a speed that the machine cannot track. It is to be slow, to be thick, to be boring. It is to claim the "Right to Rot"—to let the digital self decay so that the biological self may live.

Thesis Output: Boredom is not an absence of content; it is the presence of the self. Reclaiming "drift" is the only way to break the dopamine extraction loop. The revolutionary subject of the 21st century is not the angry protestor tweeting from the barricades; it is the bored woman on the park bench, watching the birds, engaging in the radical act of paying attention to nothing but the world itself.

End of Chapter 2.1 Report

Works cited

1. Are Social Media Apps Designed to Fuel Outrage? - YouTube, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ho1mxz0rko</u>

1. Dopamine, Prediction Error and Beyond - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7804370/</u>

1. Separate neural representations of prediction error valence and surprise: Evidence from an fMRI meta‐analysis - PubMed Central, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6866507/</u>

1. (PDF) An overview of reward prediction error and its links with dopamine - ResearchGate, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382609404_An_overview_of_reward_prediction_error_and_its_links_with_dopamine</u>

1. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3032992/</u>

1. Reward prediction error in learning-related behaviors - Frontiers, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1171612/full</u>

1. a Call to Regulate the Attention Market and Prevent Algorithmic Emotional Governance, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://arxiv.org/html/2402.16670v2</u>

1. Social media has made people 'addicted to outrage' - YouTube, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM1z0ZE0V98</u>

1. Review of Sianne Ngai, Ugly Feelings. - Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1096&context=bmrcl</u>

1. sianne-ngai-stuplimity.pdf - Shows of London, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://showsoflondon.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/sianne-ngai-stuplimity.pdf</u>

1. SIANNE NGAI - Ugly Feelings - Squarespace, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://static1.squarespace.com/static/574dd51d62cd942085f12091/t/5ae0f0fb575d1f485fff58ae/1524691195747/sianne-ngai-ugly-feelings.pdf</u>

1. Thick Language and the Ecological Stuplime in Juliana Spahr's Well Then There Now (2011) \| ISLE - Oxford Academic, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://academic.oup.com/isle/article/32/3/661/7510740</u>

1. Full article: Indebtpending: an ugly feeling of youthful financialised futurity, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13676261.2024.2371014</u>

1. The Burnout Society \| Summary, Quotes, FAQ, Audio - SoBrief, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://sobrief.com/books/the-burnout-society</u>

1. The Revolutionary Power of Boredom - UND Scholarly Commons, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=as-showcase</u>

1. In Praise of Boredom. Byung-Chul Han's “The Burnout Society” \| by Trevor Kaiser Allred, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://medium.com/@trevorkaiserallredwrites/in-praise-of-boredom-81a0c25867fe</u>

1. The Burnout Society - Oujda Library Books, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://cdn.oujdalibrary.com/books/1012/1012-the-burnout-society-(www.tawcer.com).pdf</u>.pdf)

1. Boredom at the border of philosophy: conceptual and ethical issues - PMC, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10363980/</u>

1. Sianne Ngai \| Department of English Language and Literature - The University of Chicago, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://english.uchicago.edu/people/sianne-ngai</u>

1. Prof. Sianne Ngai to Address Relationship Between Aesthetic Judgments, Capitalism in Humanities Day Keynote, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://humanities.uchicago.edu/articles/2023/09/prof-sianne-ngai-address-relationship-between-aesthetic-judgments-capitalism</u>

1. Slowdowns \| Industrial Workers of the World - iww.org, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://archive.iww.org/about/solidarityunionism/directaction/1/</u>

1. Working-to-rule strike - Museum of Protest, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://museumofprotest.org/methods/working-to-rule-strike/</u>

1. The Age of the Crisis of Work, by Erik Baker - Harper's Magazine, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://harpers.org/archive/2023/05/the-age-of-the-crisis-of-work-quiet-quitting-great-resignation/</u>

1. Is Quiet Quitting A Form of Labor Action? - Simplish, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://simplish.co/blog/quiet-quitting-work-to-rule</u>

1. Understanding the Noise Around Quiet Quitting - OnLabor, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://onlabor.org/understanding-the-noise-around-quiet-quitting/</u>

1. What can the Luddites tell us about AI and Capitalism? - Anticapitalist Resistance, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://anticapitalistresistance.org/what-can-the-luddites-tell-us-about-ai-and-capitalism/</u>

1. A live anti-social network: Some teens are ditching Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok - Brooklyn Eagle, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://brooklyneagle.com/134428/a-live-anti-social-network-some-teens-are-ditching-instagram-snapchat-and-tiktok/</u>

1. '#BOREDWITHMEG': GEnDERED BOREDOM, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://journals.lwbooks.co.uk/newformations/vol-2018-issue-93/article-8721/</u>

1. (PDF) '#BOREDWITHMEG': Gendered Boredom and Networked Media - ResearchGate, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323486309\_'BOREDWITHMEG'\_Gendered_Boredom_and_Networked_Media</u>

1. Dérive and Psychogeography: Situationist practices of urban space – immediacy previous issues, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>http://immediacy.newschool.edu/previous/?p=397</u>

1. Walking in the Drift - Justin Patrick Moore, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.sothismedias.com/home/walking-in-the-drift</u>

1. Pedestrian Provocations: Manifesting an Accessible Future - Global Performance Studies, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://gps.psi-web.org/article/view/34/33</u>

1. Intercontinental Drift - Real Life Mag, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://reallifemag.com/intercontinental-drift/</u>

1. 4.2 Conclusion and takeaways from my Journey Away from Smartphones series, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://idratherbewriting.com/smartphones/conclusion-and-learnings-smartphone-series.html</u>

1. Pay attention to me Quantifying attention to advertising through consumer neuroscience - POLITesi, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.politesi.polimi.it/retrieve/0b2d18ba-9dc3-4c00-876b-370cd47a5488/2023_10_Cvetkovic.pdf</u>

1. YouTube advertising: exploring its effectiveness - SciSpace, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://scispace.com/pdf/youtube-advertising-exploring-its-effectiveness-95h4bzm70x.pdf</u>

1. 1 EMOTIONAL MARKETING: WHAT EMOTIONS IMPROVE MEMORY? A PROSPECTUS Presented to the University Honors Program California State Un, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/3n204634c</u>

1. Audio Features and Crowdfunding Success: An Empirical Study Using Audio Mining - MDPI, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.mdpi.com/0718-1876/19/4/154</u>

1. Boredom - Skeptic Magazine, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.skeptic.com/article/boredom/</u>

1. People are increasingly bored in our digital age - PMC - NIH, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11532334/</u>

1. How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy by Jenny Odell, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.welcometothejungle.com/en/articles/how-to-do-nothing-resisting-the-attention-economy-jenny-odell</u>

1. Boredom and Bored Women in the Early Twentieth Century (Chapter 1) - Modernism, Feminism and the Culture of Boredom - Cambridge University Press, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/modernism-feminism-and-the-culture-of-boredom/boredom-and-bored-women-in-the-early-twentieth-century/5716A8268C98C1AFFC6BBE21E344FE11</u>

1. The Burnout Society \| Stanford University Press, accessed on December 19, 2025, <u>https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/burnout-society</u>